Could someone please upload speedcams and dem files separately ?
I got Navteq's Q2 maps from the first post and it lacks those files.

And one more question.
As far as I understand the TA maps have the correct speed limits, but no signposts and lane info, while the NT release has singposts\lane info but the speed limit is incorrect ?

I only need the Q2.2009 NAVTEQ of Florida... anybody can help please?

Here you are:
 http://www.filefactory.com/file/a1ha45a ... 090819.fbl

can someone upload this into a torrent ? PLEASE!!!

First of all, thank you very much for sharing these maps with everyone. However, the NAVTEQ 2009 Q2 maps are missing the .3dc files which are files needed to view 3D buildings. The .3dl files are only building landmark files. Any chance in providing the missing .3dc files for this particular update? I believe there are currently twenty .3dc files and they can probably be obtained from the TELEATLAS maps, but I was hoping that Nav N Go would have also updated their maps with more .3dc files. There are 48 continental states and if you add Hawaii, Puerto Rico and Canada, there should really be fifty-one(51) .3dc files. Nav N Go has only developed twenty(20) as far as I know.

The TA realese in the other post contain 20 .3dc files, but they seem to be dated 2008_02_21, do you want them ?

@BoomBastiC: Thanks, but I already have those. I was just hoping that this newer NAVTEQ map update would contain them along with newer and more *.3dc files.

According to naviextras, there should be Q3 maps.
How come no one released it yet ?

Great Workin!
On Touch Pro2...

A question:
How do i control the FONT size at 3D Maps?
What do i need to change or add at System.txt?

Thanks !

Wouldn't that be a question for the igo software forum and not the map additions? I believe there is no control in 3d mode, but if you go read the forums you'll find the answer, I'd suggest looking here:

viewtopic.php?p=369580#369580

look for roadsigns or roadlines per screen,

Teleatlas VS Navteq

Lots of people are thrashing teleatlas on here and I'd like to give a fair review, in fact someone is in here from PA saying they aren't accurate and that's bull****. I live in Jersey Shore Pa, I very rural town of only 3,000 people, I can tell you some differences I've experienced between teleatlas and navteq.

Navteq has no speed llimits in my area on any of the roads, though rte 220 and 180 are major highways, infact I180 is an interstate, no excuse for navteq to not have a speed limit on an interstate.

Teleatlas and navteq use different road ids for the color schemes. This is something that people fail to mention when they tell you about map changers, they are useless to me because they'd also have to change every single scheme in the igo folder to properly color the roads.

Teleatlas has WAY more details, the roadsigns on the highway can get a little annoying (I wish i could adjust the distance they were displayed), but there are more roads in the scheme color.ini used than with navteq. Teleatlas covers sidestreets in my town with a different color, navteq does not. However both of these maps can't id a unpaved road if they had to, the feature in igo to avoid unpaved roads in the USA has always been, and always will be useless till teleatlas or navteq learn what an unpaved road is. Both of these two companies id 100 year old logging roads that you can't drive on as paved roads, very stupid.

I'd have to say route calculation based on teleatlas having way more roads with speed limits has to be more accurate than navteqs lack of speed limits just about everywhere.

Teleatlas has more errors though, like for example, there's a street that's been here for 32 years in jersey shore pa that navteq has right, however, teleatlas says that it's a dead end when well, I'm looking out my house window, it's not a dead end, and never has been...

People in this forum claimed older versions of teleatlas kept jumping southbound/northbound when driving on a road, this hasn't happened to me at all with the newer versions.

1 road in a 50 mile radius has elevation with navteq, every major road has elevation with teleatlas.

My conclusion from using both maps for about 2 weeks now:

Teleatlas is the way to go for Pa, at least where I live. It might have some glitches here and there, but it makes up for it with it's unmatched level of detail that navteq fails to have. It uses more seperate road ids, more sign posts, more elevations, more speed limits, etc.

Navteq is extremely accurate, but also has glitches. It tries to take me up logging roads sometimes in a 300zx, if I attempted to do so, I'd tear the entire car apart, both of them do this, but I'm just saying, NAVTEQ isn't perfect either...

Oh yes, and Navteq is more friendly for necrophiliacs as it draws the graveyard in my town as black with the graveyard icon, teleatlas only has the icon, and not the actual graveyard.

I wish there were some program that you could merge the elevations and details of teleatlas with the accuracy of navteq, it seems that both have their +'s and both have their -'s but for two maps of the same location, they are completely different

Using TA map in SoCal, my GPS directed me to turn right onto a freeway off-ramp (VERY DANGEROUS). I went back to NavTeq map after that.
TA map still has a lot of errors in my area.

i just downloaded the navteq maps and the DCA_USA premium pois. can i just extract the DCA_USA premium pois and combine them with the existing pois that came with the program or should i delete everything in the poi folder, then put DCA_USA premium pois in?

You should/ can combine the DCA_USA premium POIs with the normal POIs because the premium POIs are intended to act as an addendum.